Skip to content
Comparison

Duppy vs Fig

A comparison between Duppy’s menu-scanning workflow and Fig’s broader food-compatibility approach.

Last reviewed April 19, 20262 sources linked below

Best for

Users who need fast restaurant menu analysis and practical ordering questions.

People who want a dedicated in-the-moment menu scanner.

Tradeoffs

Fig may offer broader food-guidance context beyond restaurant menus.

Duppy is more specialized around menu scanning and dining decisions.

Choose Fig if...

You want a broader food compatibility product beyond menu scanning.

Restaurant menu triage is not the main use case.

Key Differences

Duppy is centered on scanning menus and triaging restaurant risk in the moment.

Fig is broader across food compatibility guidance.

Duppy is more specifically tuned to menu-reading and order-decision workflow.

Detailed Feature Comparison

FeatureDuppyFig
Primary workflow
Menu scan and risk brief
Broader food guidance
Restaurant fit
High
Broader category focus
Best fit
Dining out decisions
Wider food guidance needs

The Verdict

Choose Duppy when the biggest problem is understanding restaurant menus in real time. Choose Fig when you want a broader food compatibility tool.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Duppy using AI to guess?

No. Duppy uses on-device rules and heuristics to classify risks based on known dietary patterns and common menu terminology, ensuring more reliable guidance than a generic chat model.

Does Duppy work without internet?

Yes. All text extraction and risk analysis happen locally on your iPhone using Apple Vision and on-device processing.

Which allergens are supported?

Duppy is optimized for gluten-free diets but provides signals for several other common allergens and dietary restrictions.

Choose the workflow that actually matches the job

This page is meant to help you choose the right fit, including cases where Fig may make more sense.